|
Projects: Pioneer AnomalyProject Update: Thermal Modeling Accounts for Some, But Not All, of the Pioneer Anomaly
by Emily Lakdawalla This article is an extended version of an update posted on April 17 at The Planetary Society Weblog. Researchers are attempting to understand the nature of the Pioneer Anomaly through two separate lines of inquiry: careful analysis of Doppler tracking data, and the development of a high-fidelity thermal model of the spacecraft. The Planetary Society and its members have provided partial funding for the Pioneer data recovery, validation, and analyses. On April 13 Pioneer Anomaly Project Director Slava Turyshev presented preliminary results of the thermal modeling efforts at a meeting of the American Physical Society. Making a ModelWhy is thermal modeling important? The magnitude of the Pioneer Anomaly is so very tiny that it could conceivably result from the uneven radiation of heat from the spacecraft. The Pioneers, like all spacecraft, were made from a wide variety of materials: aluminum, Teflon, Kapton, Mylar, aluminum-based paints, and so forth, all of which absorb, reflect, or emit radiation in different ways; and some materials, notably the plutonium in the spacecraft power supply, generate heat on their own. To figure out in which directions the spacecraft radiates how much heat, Turyshev and his colleagues needed to start from scratch, building a computer model of the spacecraft, covering the model with surfaces with the correct thermal properties, plugging in the recovered spacecraft data on the temperatures measured at various points within the spacecraft, and then solving a difficult set of differential equations to determine how heat conducts and radiates around within the spacecraft, and then in what direction it radiates once it exits the surface. If Turyshev had wanted to create such a model for a modern mission, like Cassini,
it would have been easy, as the computer models already exist. But there was
no such model for the Pioneers. Turyshev had to begin by performing a
treasure hunt for any and all information that could help him understand the
design and construction of the spacecraft, including piles of aging project
documents (some of which he rescued from NASA's Ames research center in 2006
just before they were to be disposed of, thanks in part to funding provided
by The Planetary Society and its members to recover Pioneer data) and archival
photographs found online and at the Smithsonian Institution. He also tracked down a few retired
engineers who had actually built the Pioneers. Some of the most useful
photographs that Turyshev used came from the personal photo albums of the retirees.
To begin with, Turyshev decided to attempt to account for the thermal behavior of just one spacecraft (Pioneer 10) at just one point in time: July of 1981, when Pioneer 10 crossed through 25 Astronomical Units (AU) from the Sun. An Astronomical Unit is the average distance between Earth and the Sun; 25 AU is midway between the orbits of Uranus and Neptune. Starting at 25 AU allowed Turyshev to make some simplifying assumptions. At that distance, Turyshev explained, the pressure from solar radiation is negligible; the temperature from the Sun is not enough to change the state of the spacecraft; and it is so cold that the louver system (designed to radiate excessive heat away from the interior of the spacecraft) is closed. Adding Real-World DataIn addition to the idealized model of the spacecraft, Turyshev also had actual
data to plug in to the model: information from temperature and other sensors
built into the spacecraft. These sensors reported a description of the
spacecraft state at regular intervals through radio telemetry to Earth. These
temperature readings provided boundary conditions fixing the temperature of
the spacecraft at certain points. With the computer model constructed
and boundary conditions set, Turyshev and his colleagues could run a computer
simulation that determined the temperature at all points on the spacecraft. The
computer simulation solved differential equations that described how heat conducted
between different parts of the interior of the spacecraft, and how heat radiated
both within the spacecraft and from the surface of the spacecraft out into
space. The computer model included 3.4 million individual radiation conductors
and took more than two days to run.
The thermal model predicted a range of temperatures for different components of the spacecraft. With the thermal model at hand, they then needed to figure out what that model really meant: would the uneven radiation of heat from the spacecraft result in a measurable acceleration, and, if so, what would its magnitude and direction be? The fact that the spacecraft spins constantly simplifies this calculation. The model predicted what Turyshev said he had been expecting all along: the thermal radiation is not isotropic (the spacecraft doesn't radiate evenly in all directions). Most of the radiation goes out the sides of the spacecraft, in a direction perpendicular to its direction of motion. And because the spacecraft spins, most of those sideways radiation effects cancel each other out. But a small component of the radiation does go in a direction parallel to the spacecraft's direction of motion. And it turns out that just a little bit more radiation goes out the side of the spacecraft pointed away from the Sun than goes out the side of the spacecraft that goes toward the Sun. This is exactly the direction of the Pioneer Anomaly. Turyshev reported that the model can generate an acceleration that amounts to about 30% of the Anomaly for that distance from the Sun. Next StepsTuryshev and his team presented their model and the preliminary results to a group of interested engineers, including several from outside of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory group (Craig Markwardt, Viktor Toth, and Louis Cheffer) at a meeting at JPL on April 4, 2008. That group generated a list of recommendations for how to improve the model's fidelity to the actual spacecraft. Also, the model included some assumptions about how the materials on the spacecraft may have degraded over time with exposure to the interplanetary radiation environment. Because little empirical data exists on how spacecraft surfaces degrade with decades of exposure to space, Turyshev plans to do sensitivity analyses: the computer simulation of the temperatures will be run again with a varying set of material properties, to determine how sensitive the model is to the variance in these parameters. Once the team is confident in the model at 25 AU, it will be run multiple times cases at other representative distances sampled by the spacecraft to see how the thermal behavior changes with time -- in particular, to study time-varying effects due to the spacecraft's distance from the Sun and the slowly decaying heat output of its plutonium electricity generators. |
||||||||||